Something’s been weighing on me, like the elephant in the room. The one on my flat-screen TV.
More elephants seem exploited in commercials lately, and I’m concerned not only for the welfare of the animal “actors” but whether there’s a hidden political message here.
Blogging about ads is not my bailiwick – my friend Jacqui Barrineau has the corner on today’s marketing mayhem. But I did notice, in northern India in January, when all the elephant statues in Uttar Pradesh state had to be covered in pink and yellow tarps just because there was an election going on. It wasn’t a new Christo installation; the national election commission actually ruled that those elephants, a symbol of a local political party, might unfairly sway voters in the March 3 election.
Well, there’s an election going on here as well, and the elephant is a symbol of a political party here, too. I’m thinking this trunkload of ads may constitute free political air time so… where are all the donkey ad divas? Showing Juan Valdez picking coffee beans and leading his sad burro around would hardly be politically correct in this global climate of turn-up-the-heat-against-illegal immigration.
First, a history lesson. Why the donkey and the elephant, again?
The Donkey— Bloody, bloody Andrew Jackson was the first Democrat associated with the donkey symbol. His 1828 presidential rivals tried to label him a “jackass” for his populist beliefs. Jackson was only amused and ran with it on his campaign posters. “Nasty” cartoonist Thomas Nast, also the creator of the American-style Santa Claus and Uncle Sam, is credited with hitching the donkey to the Democratic Party. He used it to represent an anti-Civil War faction in a cartoon in Harper’s Weekly in 1870. Unsure why he couldn’t have come up with a dove-hawk concept, but no sense rewriting history.
The Elephant— Again, credit Nast. In a 1874 Harper’s Weekly cartoon, he drew a donkey clothed in lion’s skin, trying to shoo away zoo animals. An elephant in the panel, labeled “The Republican Vote,” sealed the deal. Unsure why he wouldn’t have used an albatross, but there you go.
Back to marketing. As someone perennially trying to lose weight, I take offense that the poor elephant is always the butt of big-butt jokes. In today’s ads, this king of the land mammals is cast as burdensome or hard to accommodate.
There’s the recurring weight-of-the-world, near-death allusion for Spiriva inhalers, targeted at sufferers of COPD:
Then the Residence Inn’s resident elephant, Opal, who finally has room to breathe in her spacious suite. What they should really do is build theater and airplane seats to accommodate her — more in line with national concerns. A behind-the-scenes look:
And the ads:
The Marriott-owned chain has variations on this theme using giraffes and penguins, but not as unforgettable.
There’s also the elephant selling the Samsung Galaxy tablet, refreshingly smart and real:
(A funny comment from viewer livkivi: “Great advertisement! Yep, you convinced me, im gonna buy an elephant!”)
I’ve done my marketing research, and there’s nothing new in the elephant toolbox. Tonka played its own elephant joke in the 1970s, complete with circus trick and music:
Rolo’s rollicking take:
Pier I’s Kamba series:
Can’t forget MasterCard’s priceless vignette:
You’ll want to forget this banned Viera plasma TV ad, and forget I shared it:
Elephants even test well overseas:
Besides the Republican Party, tons of businesses and organizations have used the elephant as part of its branding – from the Animal Planet channel to Elephant Malt Liquor.
What does it all MEAN, besides that I can recognize taxonomy and know how to Google and embed video on my blog?
The point is, I’m sick of animals doing double duty as pitchmen for corporations and politics (same thing). And I’m not only sick of the two-party system, I’m sick of the symbols for the two parties.
Let’s start over. Why let some 19th-century loony bigoted artist define today’s political rivalry? Let’s send the modern Mad Men back to the drawing board to come up with something better that truly defines and differentiates these parties for us. At least give the Democrats a dolphin or something on par with the elephant’s dominance, training, aesthetics and smarts (see Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy). Or a mouse to better serve as a contrast (again, see Hitchhiker’s). Maybe let the parties figure it out, decide what and who they truly represent.
The Democrats could have the northern spotted owl as the true “conservative” (read “conservation”) party. Or an ant/bee, representing workers. Republicans could have a squirrel, hoarding up those nuts for a rainy day, stashing and not sharing the wealth. Or is it that Republicans like being represented as a trampling elephant? Maybe a bull, then, for a bull market? I dunno, work with me here. If it’s about throwing weight around, a bull sea lion may combine it all.
Sadly, the dove-hawk distinction no longer applies.
Oh! Mustn’t forget Libertarians. They should get an animal, too. What animal lives with fierce abandon?
A bunny rabbit!
Speaking of skewed symbolism: Happy Easter, peeps. Yet another excuse to add girth to our jelly bellies — and look more like elephants.